The sunk cost fallacy is the tendency to keep committing to a decision because of what has already been spent on it, rather than because of what it is likely to do from here. In trading it appears as holding a losing position past the planned exit ‘because I have already lost this much’, adding to it purely to lower the average entry price, or persisting with a strategy after months of effort even once the reasoning behind it has failed. Money and time already spent are gone either way and cannot be recovered by the current position; only the forward-looking case matters. Pre-defined stop levels and position-sizing rules are widely used precisely because they settle the exit decision before any sunk cost exists.
Next step
Guide
Spreads, Commissions and the Real Cost of a Trade
Spread, commission and swap are the three costs on every forex trade — what each one is, when spreads widen, and how to compare pricing fairly.